Brackwater Foods v Orrin Property Holdings
Nine prompts an associate would actually write
You are the associate on one matter, Brackwater Foods v Orrin Property Holdings, a dispute over whether a cold-storage tenant validly exercised a break option by email. Over nine short exercises you will write the prompts that associate would actually write, from opening the file to the partner memo, and each exercise teaches the one prompting technique that step needs. You are graded on the prompt you write, never on the output you imagine; a short prompt that hits every criterion beats a long one that misses one.
About 62 minutes of writing in total; allow about 90 minutes with a second attempt at each exercise. Start at the top; each step builds on the last. Read the principles first if you want the theory before the practice.
Exercises
Step 1: Open the file (intake note from the client email)
Not startedStep 2: Extract the break conditions from a lease that talks back
Not startedStep 3: Build the key-terms table for the file
Not startedStep 4: Cut the firm's mega-prompt before you reuse it
Not startedStep 5: Research the email-notice point without inventing a case
Not startedStep 6: Update the client in the firm's voice
Not startedStep 7: Brief the model the way a partner briefs an associate (the opening paragraph)
Not startedStep 8: Review the junior's draft against the lease, not against memory
Not startedCapstone: The partner memo (intake to advice in one prompt)
Not started